Backlinks for accessibility statements on policy pages
Learn how backlinks for accessibility statements can help your trust pages show up for procurement queries while keeping anchor text low-risk and editorial.

Why accessibility and policy pages are invisible in search
Most companies have a set of trust pages meant to answer risk questions, not attract visitors. Think accessibility statements, privacy policies, terms, security overviews, compliance notes, or a vendor risk page.
Procurement and vendor risk teams look for these pages because they need proof quickly. They’re checking whether you take accessibility seriously, how you handle data, and what policies exist before they pull you into a buying process.
The issue is that trust pages are often written to be legally correct, not searchable. They sit in the footer, use generic titles like “Policy,” and avoid the plain phrases people actually type into search. Even when the content is solid, search engines can treat the page as low-importance because few internal pages link to it and almost no outside sites reference it.
A common pattern: an accessibility statement exists as a single page with no context, no date, and no mention anywhere else on the site. It’s technically there, but it’s isolated. If nobody links to it, search engines have fewer reasons to treat it as a meaningful resource, and buyers may miss it when they’re in a hurry.
These pages often stay invisible for a few predictable reasons: they’re buried in footer-only navigation, they use vague headings that don’t match procurement SEO queries, they look like templates (no scope, no owner, no update info), they earn no editorial mentions, or they’re blocked by accident through indexing settings or duplicate versions.
Set the right expectation: backlinks for accessibility statements and other trust pages are about discoverability and credibility, not aggressive ranking tricks. A small number of relevant editorial backlinks plus clean internal linking can make a trust page easier to find during vendor review, while keeping anchor text conservative.
What procurement teams actually search for
Procurement and vendor risk teams rarely start with your brand name. They search for proof they can cite internally, screenshot, or paste into a questionnaire.
The searches tend to be plain and specific. People start broad, then add your company name after they have a shortlist. Common terms include “accessibility statement,” “WCAG compliance,” “VPAT,” “privacy policy,” “data processing agreement,” “security policy,” and “SOC 2 report.”
Those query types usually map to a few obvious destinations:
- Accessibility and WCAG terms usually point to an Accessibility Statement (and a VPAT or conformance page if you have one).
- Privacy and data handling terms point to a Privacy Policy (and a DPA page if you offer one).
- Security and controls terms point to a Security overview page (and a separate page for compliance reports, if applicable).
- Procurement onboarding terms point to a vendor information page or trust center-style hub that links to the key policies.
Not all of this traffic is “buy now” intent, but it still matters. Verification intent is about risk: “Can we approve this vendor?” Buying intent is about speed: “Can we sign this vendor this week?” If your trust pages show up for procurement SEO queries, you remove friction at the exact moment deals tend to stall.
These pages also need to answer questions fast. Put the basics near the top: last updated date, what the policy covers (scope), what you commit to, who to contact, and how issues are handled. If someone lands there from a search, they shouldn’t have to hunt.
Pick the right trust page and make it link-ready
Not every policy page is worth promoting. Choose the pages a buyer, auditor, or procurement analyst will actually open during risk review. For most companies, that shortlist is the Accessibility Statement, Privacy Policy, a Security page, and any compliance page that reflects a real program (SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, PCI - only if you can honestly support it).
Next: pick one canonical page for each topic. If you have multiple versions (a PDF, a help-center article, and a marketing page), decide which one should be indexed and cited. Keep a stable URL as the source of truth, then make everything else clearly secondary or merge it into the primary page.
Before you think about editorial backlinks, make sure the page can stand on its own when someone lands on it from a third-party site. The basics that usually matter most are simple: a clear H1 and section headings, a visible “Last updated” date you maintain, plain language that describes what you do (not what you promise), a clear contact path for requests, and a short scope note explaining what products, domains, or apps the statement applies to.
Keep sales copy out of it. A trust page that reads like an ad makes reviewers suspicious and makes editorial citations less likely.
If your Accessibility Statement currently lives as a blog post with popups and product CTAs, move it to a stable policy URL, add a factual summary of standards and contact method, and keep the tone neutral.
How backlinks help trust pages without getting risky
Trust pages like accessibility statements, security summaries, and privacy policies often sit outside your main marketing funnel. They can be hard for search engines to find because they don’t attract natural mentions and they’re not linked prominently inside the site.
A small number of high-quality backlinks can change that. When reputable pages cite your policy page as a reference, search engines get a clear path to crawl it and a reason to treat it as a real resource, not a forgotten footer link.
The goal isn’t to “rank overnight” or promise a specific position. The practical win is better discovery, more reliable indexing, and clearer credibility signals for people searching with procurement-style questions.
Why a few good links are safer than many weak ones
Dozens of low-quality links look unnatural fast, especially when they point at a page that isn’t meant to be promotional. A handful of editorial backlinks from relevant, established sites tends to be lower risk because it matches how trust content is cited in the real world.
A good backlink to a trust page usually looks like a citation in an article about vendor evaluation, a resource mention for accessibility or governance checklists, a reference in a product comparison where vendors are listed, or a footnote-style pointer to an official statement.
What “low-risk” looks like in practice
Keep the intent simple: help a reader verify something.
Example: a SaaS company publishes an accessibility statement that explains standards, contact options, and an update date. A respected publication writes about inclusive procurement processes and cites the statement as an example of what buyers should look for. That one mention can send the right kind of visitor and help the page get crawled more consistently.
If you work with a link placement provider, the safest approach is to choose placements where a trust page citation makes editorial sense and to prioritize authority and relevance over volume. Treat links as a visibility and trust signal, not a guarantee of rankings or approvals.
Low-risk anchor text for accessibility and policy pages
Anchor text is the clickable words people see. For trust pages, the safest approach is plain and descriptive. Use the same language an editor would naturally write when referencing a policy.
When you build backlinks for accessibility statements, think like a reviewer doing due diligence. They want a clear pointer to the exact document, not a sales message.
Anchors that usually stay low-risk
Good anchors name the document directly, sometimes with your brand for clarity:
- “[Brand] accessibility statement”
- “accessibility statement”
- “accessibility policy”
- “privacy policy”
- “security policy” or “information security policy” (only if the page truly covers it)
A small tweak can make anchors feel even more editorial: use context words sparingly, like “read the accessibility statement” or “view the privacy policy.” Keep it plain.
Anchors to avoid (they raise flags)
Avoid anchors that sound like marketing copy, make absolute claims, or try to rank for unrelated terms. “Best accessibility compliance service” and “get compliant now” don’t read like citations. Unrelated commercial keywords and repeated exact-match stuffing are also common problems.
How to vary anchors safely
Variation helps, but it should still look natural.
A simple mix is usually enough: a few brand-plus-document anchors, a few plain document anchors, and a small number of URL anchors (where the text is just your domain or page URL). If three sites mention your accessibility statement, one might use a brand-plus-document phrasing, one might use the plain document name, and one might cite the URL as a reference.
Step-by-step plan to build backlinks to trust pages
Pick one page to be the source of truth for procurement reviewers. For many sites, that’s the Accessibility Statement. When signals are spread across multiple similar pages, it’s harder for Google and for buyers to know which one matters.
A simple 5-step workflow
Keep the process repeatable and focused on trust pages SEO, not volume.
- Choose one primary target page. Use the clearest page and make sure it includes a real last-updated date, contact method, and plain-language commitments.
- Add 2 to 3 supporting trust pages and connect them naturally. Privacy, security, and compliance pages help the main page feel complete. Link between them where it makes sense.
- Define a small anchor set and keep it boring. Write 5 to 8 anchor options, then stick to them. Lean toward brand, URL, and neutral anchors, with a smaller share of descriptive anchors like “accessibility statement.”
- Choose citation-friendly sites, not random blogs. Aim for places where standards and policies are commonly referenced: resources pages, industry publications, directories that include governance details, and tech write-ups that cite policies.
- Track outcomes weekly in Search Console. Watch for indexing, a slow rise in impressions, and new queries that look like vendor review language. Also check that the correct page is earning impressions.
What to watch after links go live
A realistic outcome is that your page starts showing impressions for brand-plus-compliance searches, even if clicks stay low. Procurement teams often verify, screenshot, and share internally, so impressions can be meaningful.
Example: making an accessibility statement searchable for vendor review
A mid-market SaaS vendor gets a procurement questionnaire from a large enterprise. One question seems simple: “Provide your accessibility statement and any supporting documentation.” The vendor has a statement, but it lives as a footer link under a generic “Legal” page.
The buyer’s team does what they always do: they search the web for the vendor name plus “accessibility statement,” “WCAG,” or “VPAT.” Nothing obvious shows up. Procurement emails support, support forwards it to legal, and a quick check turns into a week of back-and-forth.
What the vendor changes (so the page is easy to verify)
They publish one dedicated Accessibility Statement page with a clear title and simple structure. It stays factual and gets maintained.
They also make a few changes that help both reviewers and search engines:
- Add a clear H1 (“Accessibility Statement”) and a short summary at the top.
- Include a “Last updated” date and a contact method for accessibility feedback.
- Use scannable headings like “Standards we aim to follow (WCAG)” and “Known limitations.”
- Mention the product name and company name naturally in the first paragraph.
- Link to related trust pages (security, privacy, terms) using plain wording.
Adding a few editorial links without raising risk
Next, they build a small number of editorial backlinks focused on relevance and low-risk anchor text. The goal isn’t aggressive SEO. It’s discoverability for vendor review.
Instead of keyword-heavy anchors, they use “this is what it is” phrasing, such as “Accessibility statement,” “Accessibility policy,” “WCAG conformance,” or “Accessibility contact.”
They place 2 to 4 links from pages where the reference fits naturally, like a compliance resource page, a vendor directory that includes governance details, or an industry publication discussing accessibility expectations.
The outcome is practical: procurement can confirm the statement quickly in search, internal teams spend less time chasing PDFs, and the vendor looks organized before the first call.
Common mistakes that raise risk or waste effort
Most accessibility statements and policy pages fail because they read like a checkbox. If the page is thin, vague, or outdated, backlinks won’t help much and can draw the wrong kind of attention.
One common issue is publishing a page with no real commitments. If you claim you support accessibility but don’t explain what standard you follow (in plain language), how users can report issues, and what happens next, reviewers will treat it like a template.
Anchor text is another easy way to create risk. Avoid salesy or absolute claims. “Best accessibility compliance” looks unnatural. Unrelated commercial anchors look manipulative.
Five mistakes that repeatedly waste effort:
- Linking to a thin page with no contact method, update date, or clear responsibilities.
- Using aggressive, promotional, or off-topic anchors that don’t match the page.
- Splitting signals across multiple near-identical pages.
- Building too many links too fast, or using low-quality sites made mainly for SEO.
- Forgetting internal links from relevant places like product pages, your security page, legal pages, and the footer.
Duplicate targets are especially sneaky. If you have “Accessibility Statement,” “Accessibility Policy,” and a help-center article that says the same thing, you force Google and humans to guess which one matters. Pick one main page, improve it, and support it.
Quick checklist before you build links
A fast pre-link check (5 minutes)
Before you point any backlinks at a trust page, make sure the page looks like something a real reviewer would rely on. Procurement teams often open these pages under time pressure, and anything unclear can make them feel outdated or untrustworthy.
Start with access and context. If someone lands on your homepage, can they find the page quickly without guessing? A trust page buried in a PDF, behind a login, or five clicks deep rarely earns natural links and rarely reassures a buyer.
Use this checklist:
- Easy to reach: Reachable in 1 to 2 clicks from the footer or Help/Support area, and loads fast on mobile.
- Clear signals: A specific title (not just “Policy”), a visible “Last updated” date, and a simple contact method for accessibility or compliance questions.
- Careful standards wording: If you mention WCAG (or another standard), keep language accurate and conservative unless you have evidence for stronger claims.
- Low-risk anchor expectations: Link text you’d be comfortable seeing is mostly brand or neutral and matches normal editorial wording.
- Quality over quantity: The plan is a small number of strong editorial links from relevant, trusted sites.
If any item fails, fix the page first. A better page makes every future link safer and more effective.
Next steps: a simple, safe way to start
Pick one trust page to focus on first. Choose the page that shows up most often in your sales cycle: an accessibility statement for public sector and enterprise procurement, a privacy policy for data-heavy workflows, or a security page if security questionnaires slow deals.
Make the page easy to cite. A clear title, a short summary near the top, and an honest “last updated” date make it feel official. A buyer scanning quickly should understand the scope and contact path in under a minute.
Write a small anchor plan before you build any links. Keep it conservative and boring on purpose. A simple mix is usually enough: brand anchors, descriptive document anchors (like “accessibility statement”), URL anchors, and a small number of mixed phrases.
Start with a few authoritative editorial placements, not dozens of random links. Place a small batch, wait a few weeks, then check Search Console for indexing, impressions, and the kinds of queries showing up.
If you want a controlled way to secure editorial backlinks without doing outreach, SEOBoosty (seoboosty.com) focuses on premium placements on authoritative websites, which fits the “few strong links” approach trust pages typically need.
FAQ
Why doesn’t my accessibility statement show up in Google when people search for it?
Procurement and vendor risk teams often search for proof pages using plain terms, not your navigation. If your statement is only linked from the footer, has a vague title, and isn’t referenced elsewhere, search engines may treat it as low-importance and crawlers may visit it less often.
What do procurement teams actually type into search for these pages?
Most people start with document-style queries like “accessibility statement,” “WCAG compliance,” or “VPAT,” and only add your company name after they shortlist vendors. They want something they can cite quickly in a review, not a marketing page.
Should I have one policy page or multiple versions (PDF, help article, legal page)?
Use one canonical, stable URL as the source of truth. If you have a PDF, a help-center article, and a legal page that say similar things, consolidate or clearly designate the primary page so both reviewers and search engines know which version to trust.
Do backlinks really help an accessibility statement, or is it pointless SEO?
A few strong editorial citations can help search engines discover and re-crawl the page more reliably, and they give buyers a credible reference path. The goal is discoverability and verification, not trying to force a competitive ranking for unrelated commercial keywords.
What anchor text is safest for backlinks to policy and accessibility pages?
Keep anchor text plain and document-focused, like an editor would write in a citation. “Accessibility statement,” “privacy policy,” or “[Brand] accessibility statement” are usually safer than anything promotional or overly optimized.
What should I avoid when building links to trust pages?
Don’t use salesy language, absolute claims you can’t prove, or repeated keyword-stuffed anchors. Also avoid pointing lots of links at a thin, template-like page, because it can draw scrutiny and still won’t satisfy a reviewer.
What makes a trust page “link-ready” for vendor review?
Put the essentials near the top so a rushed reviewer can confirm details fast: scope, a maintained “Last updated” date, what you aim to follow (in accurate language), and a clear contact path. Keep the tone factual so it reads like a real policy, not an ad.
How important is internal linking compared with backlinks for these pages?
Internal links tell search engines the page matters and help humans find it without guessing. Link to your key trust pages from relevant places like your help area, legal section, security overview, and any product pages where users might look for compliance information.
How many backlinks should I build to an accessibility statement without raising risk?
Start small and prioritize relevance and authority over volume, because trust pages are normally cited sparingly. A handful of well-placed editorial mentions that make contextual sense is usually safer than many low-quality links added quickly.
How do I measure success for trust page backlinks if clicks stay low?
Track whether the right canonical page gets indexed, whether impressions rise for brand-plus-policy or compliance-style queries, and whether the page is being discovered without internal teams needing to email PDFs. Low clicks can still be a win if the page is easy to verify during reviews.