Link building service
A link building service with nothing to schedule.
youtube.com$3,198
microsoft.comfrom$1,599
nytimes.comfrom$799
arstechnica.comfrom$499
mit.edufrom$79
Most link building services sell you a month of somebody emailing editors and a report at the end of it. This one sells the result: links that already exist, priced before you commit, pointing at your URL inside the hour.
Covered for 12 months: if a package fails, we replace it with a comparable one. see the terms
- No retainer, no minimum
- Priced before you commit
- Live in about an hour
Publishers in the catalog now
How the service works
Four things an agency cannot promise you.
Nothing here depends on somebody answering an email, so nothing here needs a timeline with a range on it.
A price before a call
Every price is printed in the catalog. No discovery call, no proposal, no scoping week before anyone will name a number.
A delivery time in hours
About an hour from payment to working links. No quarter-long timelines and no waiting on someone's inbox.
Reporting that opens on your account
Every source page, every anchor an editor typed and every check, released the moment the backlinks are yours. No monthly deck.
No retainer
Buy one set of backlinks or twenty. One payment covers twelve months, and there is nothing to renegotiate when the quarter turns.
Head publisher
theverge.com
- Does not sell links
- Dofollow
- Placed 2012
- 1,756
- backlinks in total
- 82
- independent sites
The domain name appears in your account as soon as you buy.
$1,299per year
Checked live before you pay
Against a retainer
What a month of agency work actually buys.
An outreach month is mostly waiting. Somebody builds a list, writes the pitches, sends them, and a small share of editors answer. What lands is whatever those editors were willing to take, which is rarely the publisher you had in mind and never a website that does not sell links. You pay for the attempt either way.
- You choose the publisher instead of accepting whoever replied.
- The anchor text was written by an editor years ago, so nothing reads like a brief.
- No campaign minimum, so a single purchase is a normal order.
- You see the result before you buy instead of a report after you pay.
Four real examples and what was in them.
Head publisher, then the number of links that came with it. Every row was a real listing.
- $149
massart.edu
76 backlinks in total · 47 independent sites
- $799
technologyreview.com
142 backlinks in total · 79 independent sites
- $1,299
theverge.com
1,756 backlinks in total · 82 independent sites
- $1,999
microsoft.com
385 backlinks in total · 169 independent sites
Questions
What agencies and in-house teams ask.
- What does a link building service cost here?
- Prices start at $79 a year. You pay per order rather than per month, so there is no retainer, no setup fee and no minimum campaign size.
- How many links will I get?
- You get one or two links from the head publisher and typically 250 to 1,500 more behind them. The catalog tells you the count before you buy, so nothing is estimated.
- Do you do outreach on my behalf?
- No, and that is the point. Outreach is the slow, uncertain part of link building. Everything in the catalog is already in place, so there is nobody to persuade and nothing to wait for.
- Can I see the links before I commit?
- You see the publisher at the head, the link count, how many separate sites are involved, the age of the oldest page and the price. Every source URL and anchor opens on your account when the backlinks are yours.
- Do you work with agencies?
- Yes. Bulk terms and reports you can rebrand are on the white label page, and there is a form there for anyone reselling to clients.
- How long do the links stay up?
- Editors placed them on pages nobody has changed in years, which is the best sign a link will stay. The backlinks stay pointed at your URL as long as you own them.
Start with one order.
No call, no proposal, no minimum. Open the catalog, pick a publisher, and see what comes with it.
Covered for 12 months: if a package fails, we replace it with a comparable one.see the terms